Thursday, September 24, 2020

[NJFAC] Forgotten History of the Workers' Unemployment Insurance Bill

....
...we might draw inspiration from the remarkable story of the now-forgotten Workers' Unemployment Insurance Bill that was introduced in Congress in 1934, 1935, and 1936.

Despite essentially no press coverage and extreme hostility from the business community and the Roosevelt administration, a popular movement developed in support of this bill that had been written by the Communist Party. The mass pressure that was brought to bear on Congress secured a stunning victory in the spring of 1935, when the bill became the first unemployment insurance plan in U.S. history to be recommended by a congressional committee (the House Labor Committee). It was defeated in the House—by a vote of 204 to 52—but the widespread support for the bill was likely a factor in the easy passage later in 1935 of the relatively conservative Social Security Act, which laid the foundation for the American welfare state.
Aside from its direct legislative importance, the Workers' Bill is of interest in that it shows just how left-wing vast swathes of the U.S. population were in the 1930s and can become when a political force emerges to articulate their grievances. This bill, which was far more radical than provisions in the Soviet Union for social insurance, was endorsed by over 3,500 local unions (and the regular conventions of several International unions and state bodies of the American Federation of Labor), practically every unemployed organization in the country, fraternal lodges, governmental bodies in over seventy cities and counties, and groups representing veterans, farmers, Blacks, women, the youth, and churches. In the West, the South, the Midwest, and the East, millions of citizens signed petitions and postcards in support of it. And this was all despite the active hostility of every sector of society with substantial resources.....

my highlight--jz
--
June Zaccone
National Jobs for All Coalition
http://www.njfac.org

--
This list is only for announcements, so you may not post. To contact the list manager, write to njfac [at] njfac.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "goodjobs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to goodjobsforall+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/goodjobsforall/CAPV%3DhmAK%2BiSqkCpSQ9keQSkT4fFsjnp6zERp4Hdndmurv8Mg9Q%40mail.gmail.com.

Tuesday, September 8, 2020

[NJFAC] Unemployment & mental health

August 19, 2020 Professor at Magdalene College, University of Cambridge Research Associate at Center for Business Research, University of Cambridge 

It will not be long before a million people have died as a direct result of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the number of people who have suffered from it is far greater than the list of fatalities. 

Many of us have endured minor inconveniences, such as shortages in the shops and an absence of sport on our televisions or being cut off from loved ones. But, for many people, the biggest impact is on our working lives. 

Unemployment can be a source of misery in a number of different ways. The most obvious problem with unemployment is the financial strain it brings, not only for the individual and family who lose a wage, but also for most states, which then provide welfare payments to offset the extremes of poverty.

But, beyond the financial aspects of unemployment, the effects on mental health are substantial, with a sizable increase in the risk of anxiety and depressive symptoms. It is clear from the research that the financial aspects of the loss of employment only account for a small part of associated mental health problems. 

The Mental Misery of Being Unemployed

There is a large body of evidence that shows that the mental health benefits from paid employment extend far beyond the financial rewards. Psychologists have listed the benefits of working to include the time structure that employment provides, the social contact, having a positive identity, a non-stigmatized status and sharing meaningful goals with other employees.

....

--
June Zaccone
National Jobs for All Coalition
http://www.njfac.org

--
This list is only for announcements, so you may not post. To contact the list manager, write to njfac [at] njfac.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "goodjobs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to goodjobsforall+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/goodjobsforall/CAPV%3DhmBdiY7ey4KPtOGtw7NNoNyeREHkWDHenksSniPk804nxg%40mail.gmail.com.

Monday, August 17, 2020

[NJFAC] Uber admits underpaying drivers by 30% to 120%!

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 By Frank Stricker
            Well, the company doesn't quite put it that way, but that is how much more Uber claims riders would have to pay for a ride if Uber is forced to treat its de facto employees as employees rather than as independent contractors. Uber and Lyft are fighting tooth and nail against AB 5, a California law that went into effect on January 1, 2020. The law aimed to force companies like Uber to modify their robber-baron business model and allow their workers the rights and benefits other employees have.
            The Uber business model is frosted in rhetoric about driver flexibility, modern technology, and neighborliness: the worker chooses when to work, the allocation of rides is facilitated by an app, and the whole process is sometimes called ride-sharing. ("You were driving downtown anyway--why not share a little and get paid for adding a rider?")
            But the reality of the Uber business model is that pay is low and most of the risks of the job and of life itself are loaded onto the workers. The company contributes nothing to Social Security, Medicare, workers compensation, tax shelters, health insurance, or state unemployment insurance funds. The last fact is why, early in the covid plague, the federal government--ultimately, we the tax payers-- had to pay the whole bill for giving unemployment benefits to independent contractors, aka gig workers.
            Also, independent contractors are not normally covered by overtime and minimum wage laws. Their real average pay, after subtracting the cost to the worker of car insurance, gas, maintenance, and other things, is sometimes very low--far below legislated minimums in states like California.
            While there is a real convenience factor for many people who drive for Uber, Lyft, and similar companies, drivers are generally subsidizing the price of a ride so that it is less than it ought to be, and they are subsidizing the companies who underpay the people who are, in key respects, their employees. Yes, some drivers are OK with part-time low-pay work. Others have organized to demand a better deal. Most drivers don't drive full-time or year-round and quite a few start driving after they've had a significant loss of income, due to unemployment, family emergencies, or something else. That is, they are desperate. In general Uber-type jobs are not the kind you'd like to have if you want to build a family and buy a home.
            California's AB 5 requires that companies like Uber and Lyft treat their employees like employees. Uber and Lyft refused to obey the law. They sued the government. They lost the case and were ordered to classify their California drivers as employees. The companies are appealing. Some companies are talking about creating a third way that includes aspects of the employer-employee relationship. Uber's chief, Dara Khosrowshahi, who, in 2019, received a $45 million-dollar pay package that included $2 million just for work-related expenses, has proposed a pool of cash that workers could use for health insurance, leaves, and other things. New York Times writer Noam Scheiber notes that if companies go too far in that direction, they will look more like employers of employees than mere facilitators of the work of independent contractors.
            Some third-way suggestions are on the California ballot this fall as Proposition 22. Uber, Lyft, Doordash and other companies have raised over $100,000,000 to support Prop 22. The proposition exempts transportation company drivers from the regulations in AB 5 and it makes promises about minimum wages and health benefits. These promises may be iffy in a number of ways, including how many hours drivers must drive to qualify and whether wait time will count as work time. And in general, new benefits will have to be small. Otherwise, the Uber model may not endure.
 
Stricker is a board member of the National Jobs for All Network, Emeritus Professor of History, CSUDH, and author of American Unemployment, Past, Present, and Future (2020).
 
 

--
This list is only for announcements, so you may not post. To contact the list manager, write to njfac [at] njfac.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "goodjobs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to goodjobsforall+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/goodjobsforall/491323783.2756097.1597695336705%40mail.yahoo.com.

Friday, August 14, 2020

[NJFAC] TODAY FRIDAY, 8/14 @ 1:00 PM >> "The Economics of the COVID-19 Public Health and Economic Crisis"


Subject: FRIDAY, 8/14 @ 1:00 PM >>  "The Economics of the COVID-19 Public Health and Economic Crisis"

National Jobs for All Network
_______________________________________________________________________
P.O. Box 96, Lynbrook, NY 11563 · njfan@njfac.org · www.njfac.org 
Special Announcement, August 2020
 

please share widely---
 
The Economics of the COVID-19 Public Health and Economic Crisis 
When: Friday, Aug 14, 2020, 1:00 PM - 2:30 PM Eastern Time
 
Register in advance for this webinar:
After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar. 

Panelists will discuss:
  • Why reopening the economy now is economically counterproductive;
     
  • Why we CAN afford to float the economy and meet people's needs until it is safe to reopen;
     
  • Why the best way to respond to the COVID-19 public health and economic crisis is to enact legislation that meets current needs while simultaneously laying the foundation for a permanent restructuring of public policy in the United States to build a just, egalitarian and anti-racist society committed to the realization of everyone's civil, political, economic, social and cultural human rights everywhere in the world.

Speakers:
  • Walter Tsou, former Commissioner of the Philadelphia Department of Health and past President of the American Public Health Association.
  • Philip Harvey, Professor of Law and Economics, Rutgers Law School, and author of Securing the Right to Employment: Social Welfare Policy and the Unemployed in the United States.
  • William Darity, Samuel DuBois Cook Distinguished Professor of Public Policy, Professor of African and African American Studies, and Professor of Economics, Duke University, and coauthor, with Kirsten Mullen of From Here to Equality: Reparations for Black Americans in the Twenty-First Century.
  • Radhika Balakrishnan, Professor of Women's and Gender Studies, Rutgers University, Faculty Director of the Rutgers Center for Women's Global Leadership, and co-author with James Heintz and Diane Elson of Rethinking Economic Policy for Social Justice: The Radical Potential of Human Rights.
  • Joel Segal, Co-Founder and Board Member, Progressive Democrats of America; Co-Convenor, US National COVID-19 Emergency Response Group; and former Staffer to Rep. John Conyers with responsibility for overseeing H.R. 676, Rep. Conyers's Medicare for All Act, and H.R. 1000, Mr. Conyers's "Humphrey-Hawkins 21st Century Full Employment and Training Act," also known as the "Jobs for All Act."
  •  Alan Minsky, Executive Director, Progressive Democrats of America; long-time progressive activist and journalist.
Contact:
--
Dr. Paul Zeitz, Executive Director, Build A Movement 2020 
mobile: +1-202-365-6786 | email: drpaulzeitz@gmail.com
 

Get Involved!!


 Join/Donate!      Subscribe!

The National Jobs for All Network is dedicated to the propositions that meaningful employment is a precondition for a fulfilling life, and that every person capable of working should have the right to a job.

NJFAN relies on your support. If you find our material useful, please make a tax-deductible donation. We are all volunteers, except for a part-time coordinator. 

National Jobs for All Network
P.O. Box 96
Lynbrook, NY 11563
203-856-3877
Web: www.njfac.org
Email: njfan@njfac.org 
 
 
Twitter
Facebook
Website
 
 
Copyright © 2020 National Jobs for All Network, All rights reserved.
You are receiving this email because you have signed up to get occasional updates and information from the National Jobs for All Coalition.

Our mailing address is:
National Jobs for All Network
PO Box 96
Lynbrook, NY 11563


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp
 

Virus-free. www.avg.com


--
June Zaccone
National Jobs for All Coalition
http://www.njfac.org

--
This list is only for announcements, so you may not post. To contact the list manager, write to njfac [at] njfac.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "goodjobs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to goodjobsforall+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/goodjobsforall/CAPV%3DhmC1jeFKitDWwSomnm2HGu%3DFzo9_PoR%2Bhx9X8T182WW%2Beg%40mail.gmail.com.

Sunday, August 2, 2020

[NJFAC] Automatic stabilizers could help workers and economy in a crisis

The Extremely Boring Idea That Could Save the Economy They're called automatic stabilizers Jordan Weissman, Slate, July 31, 2020

....

The United States has a number of automatic stabilizers in action already, though we don't always think of them as such. Safety-net programs like food stamps and unemployment insurance, for instance, fit the bill. They are designed primarily to help Americans in times of need, but as a result they also add ballast to the wider economy at moments of crisis by boosting household spending power and aggregate demand.

But Recession Ready's contributors wanted to take the concept much further. The government could redesign unemployment benefits and food stamps to increase in value when unemployment spikes. Washington could send households cash, deliver more aid to states, and increase infrastructure spending during periods of weakness—all automatically. In many ways, the book reflected the lessons and scars of the Obama era, when the White House spent years battling recalcitrant Republicans on Capitol Hill for more fiscal stimulus while the economy languished. And rather than praying for responsible leaders in Congress to save the day through white-knuckle, down-to-the-wire negotiations, it argued, you could set up the better part of a recession-fighting machine ahead of time, allowing it to run on autopilot whenever the need arose.

....
Programs also tend to work better if they are in advance and tested, instead of thrown together on the fly while the world is burning. Had Congress decided ahead of time that it wanted to let freelancers get unemployment benefits, or try to pay people their full wages after losing a job, or send out checks to nearly every American at a moment's notice the next time the economy crumbled, we might have had good systems in place to do them. Instead, we've run into all manner of administrative and logistical headaches, from laid off workers waiting months for their benefits to the Treasury sending out prepaid debit cards that people threw away because they looked like junk mail.....

--
June Zaccone
National Jobs for All Coalition
http://www.njfac.org

--
This list is only for announcements, so you may not post. To contact the list manager, write to njfac [at] njfac.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "goodjobs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to goodjobsforall+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/goodjobsforall/CAPV%3DhmCcW6hQL%3DBuEGU3RtUyyTPqpKY%3DcM%3DSKQac7MGKViE%3Dyg%40mail.gmail.com.

Monday, May 18, 2020

[NJFAC] NYT job guarantee op-ed


Good news – the NYT published an oped from Angela Glover Blackwell and Darrick Hamilton calling for a job guarantee with a link to the Jobs for All pledge. Please check it out and share: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/09/opinion/federal-jobs-guarantee-coronavirus.html


Darrick Hamilton is on the Advisory Bd of the National Jobs for All Network. JZ


--
June Zaccone
National Jobs for All Coalition
http://www.njfac.org

--
This list is only for announcements, so you may not post. To contact the list manager, write to njfac [at] njfac.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "goodjobs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to goodjobsforall+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/goodjobsforall/CAPV%3DhmCv_h2rvK7mkOAGY4oATTqr2Oq-tJrr5-obpPFFwmGOTw%40mail.gmail.com.

Saturday, May 9, 2020

[NJFAC] Georgia Opens Up. Things Get Worse for the Working Class by Frank Stricker

-Jenny Jarvis, "Georgians Wary Amid Gradual Reopening," Los Angeles Times, May 2, 2020.
-Amanda Mull, "Georgia's Experiment in Human Sacrifice," The Atlantic, April 29, 2020.
-Elizabeth Fite, "Georgia  Gov. Kemp Balances Health Effects of Unemployment, COVID-19 in State's Reopening Plan," Chattanooga Times Free Press, May 4, 2020.
 
            These three articles about Governor Brian Kemp's effort to open the economy in Georgia raise many questions, including whether the opening will work to jump start the state's economy, whether it will do so without a hefty death bump, and whether the opening is driven by right-wing ideology rather than by science and compassion. The articles offer plenty about the COVID crisis seen from the bottom up. No surprise, but the main victims of both the shutdown and premature re-openings are and will be the Georgia working class, and especially black people.  
            The re-opening plan has received an A from Freedom Works, an extremist anti-government organization, but it has not won over a majority of Georgians. And for good reason. Here are key issues in the Georgia situation can help us think about re-openings around the country.
           
1. Obviously vaccines and cures are crucial in the long run, but right now, the pathway to re-opening must include much more testing. The main reason so many of us are confined to our homes is that we do not know who is sick and contagious. Georgia lags in testing; so do many other states, including my home state of California. The opener-chief in the White House has pretty much abdicated on the testing issue. Widely available testing services should have been the minimum requirement for re-opening businesses and public spaces.
 
2. While Kemp's reopening plan gets an A from large businesses and a right-wing anti-government group, it does not win the voters of Georgia. In a University of Georgia survey, 62% disapproved of Kemp's lifting of restrictions. People are afraid. Zack Lee, a hair salon owner, does not want himself and his clients to be used as guinea pigs in Kemp's experiment. Many Georgians are apprehensive about entering restaurants and other businesses, even with spacing requirements. In Georgia and elsewhere, it seems likely that many restaurants and other small business will not survive, even if they are able to partially re-open now. A lot of jobs are not coming back.
            A rational and humane presidential administration would be planning for major job programs in social and physical infrastructure areas to replace jobs that are permanently lost. There are several bills in Congress that are ready to go. Among them are NJFAN's  HR 1000 which can bring millions of jobs in a variety of occupations to areas that have long had high unemployment, There is also legislation for a National Infrastructure Bank to fund trillions of dollars worth of major projects to repair or build bridges, roads, trains, affordable housing, broadband connections, and so on.
 
3. Kemp and Trump want us to focus more on economic expansion than the plague. Trump needs an economic recovery to win re-election. But if people are afraid to move around the economic marketplace, if severe occupancy restrictions limit customers and if a new death bump causes new restrictions, many small businesses will disappear.
 
4. Most governors and especially Republicans pay attention to right-wingers and business leaders. Kemp is no exception. One subsidiary goal of his economic plan may be to trim the number of people getting unemployment benefits. If businesses are allowed to open, officials may assume that the jobs are there, even if there aren't enough or if it is dangerous to work. An official in the Georgia Department of Labor has said that fear of getting infected at work will not be sufficient to qualify for unemployment benefits. So the state will be removing unemployed workers from state unemployment benefits, and from the federal weekly subsidy of $600.
            So a restaurant worker earning a typical wage of $10 to $13 an hour for a thirty-hour week could earn $300 to $390, but on unemployment benefits, she might have received $200 from the state and $600 from the federal government. Quite a bit more. In this way, some people will be poorer due to the opening.  And more will get sick.
            (By the way, stricter rules for unemployment benefits are in line with long-standing efforts by Republicans to limit unemployment benefits, keep the labor pool over-full, and add work requirements to government programs, including food stamps.)
 
5. As elsewhere, in Georgia a disproportionate number of people who are poor and who are sick are minorities, including African Americans.
 
6. As more people get sick in Georgia, some people will not get to see doctors and nurses in a timely manner. Georgia refused to expand their Medicaid rolls, despite the fact that the federal government foots most of the bill under the Affordable Care Act.
 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Frank Stricker is a member of NJFAN. His views are not necessarily those of the organization.
His new book, American Unemployment, is out in June.

--
This list is only for announcements, so you may not post. To contact the list manager, write to njfac [at] njfac.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "goodjobs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to goodjobsforall+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/goodjobsforall/462508857.708635.1589044980019%40mail.yahoo.com.