Friday, February 20, 2026

[NJFAC] Why Your Boss Can Block Your Unemployment Benefits

Why Your Boss Can Block Your Unemployment Benefits And what it means for worker wellbeing and access to the safety net  Alexander Hertel-Fernandez and Alix Gould-Werth  2/10/26

When you lose your job, applying for unemployment insurance should be straightforward: you file a claim, the state verifies you're eligible, and you start receiving benefits to keep you afloat while you search for new work. But there's a player in this process most people don't know about until it's often too late: your former employer, who has both the right and a powerful financial incentive to fight your claim.....

Follow the Money

The U.S. unemployment insurance system has an unusual method of funding benefits that exists virtually nowhere else among other rich democracies: "experience rating." Under experience rating, employers generally pay payroll taxes that fund UI benefits, and those tax rates rise when their former workers successfully claim benefits. (Only one state–Alaska–uses a different system in which employer taxes rise in proportion to their layoffs, rather than benefit claims.) It's like car insurance: more claims mean higher premiums for employers.

The original theory behind this system was elegant: employers would avoid unnecessary layoffs if doing so raised their tax bill. In addition, employers would help "police" the system to ensure that only eligible workers receive benefits.

But experience rating creates another incentive too—one the program's designers perhaps didn't fully anticipate. Employers can also lower their tax burden by contesting their workers' legitimate and illegitimate claims, making it harder for laid-off employees to receive benefits in the first place.

Indeed, the experience rating system has spawned a growing industry of "claims management" consultants who market their services by promising to reduce employers' UI tax bills through more aggressive contestation. As one journalist put it, these firms have turned fighting unemployment claims into a "boom industry."....

Important recent work on one state (Washington) shows that employers strongly influence worker access to UI benefits. The authors find that "if all employers [in Washington in their sample from 2005 to 2013] with below-median claim effects moved to the median, then the UI claim rate would increase by 6 percentage points." The authors also find that employer effects help explain the income gradient in UI benefit access, with higher-earning workers more likely to receive benefits because their employers are less likely to contest their claims. But we do not have a national perspective.

A Quarter of Claims Face Employer Pushback

To tackle this absence of national evidence, we drew from an original nationally representative survey of workers who experienced unemployment between 2019 and 2024. In that survey, we asked unemployed workers who filed for UI benefits if their employer fought their claim. We find that about 26 percent of UI applicants reported having their claim contested by their employer. That's far higher than the 4-8 percent suggested by earlier studies that focused on one state (Washington) where researchers can access detailed UI records.....

--
June Zaccone
National Jobs for All Network
http://www.njfac.org

--
This list is only for announcements, so you may not post. To contact the list manager, write to junez [at] njfac.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "goodjobs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to goodjobsforall+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/goodjobsforall/CAPV%3DhmBWVxf9yFQVRxA8_q3ffUGZkxpCUbGkV4N%2BbkOqLGoG3w%40mail.gmail.com.

Tuesday, February 17, 2026

[NJFAC] pace of US wealth concentration

--
This list is only for announcements, so you may not post. To contact the list manager, write to junez [at] njfac.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "goodjobs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to goodjobsforall+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/goodjobsforall/CAPV%3DhmCfC8JQsSDuNBQgUy0GhmR_jM8h%3DAe%2B2cip%2Bir_Mj5w8Q%40mail.gmail.com.

[NJFAC] NJFAN member letter on Jesse Jackson's death.

Sheila is one of the founders of the National Jobs For All Network. Her letter will be published in the  which will be published in the NY Times. jz

To the Editor:

Re "Jesse Jackson, Charismatic Champion of Civil Rights, Dies at 84" (obituary, nytimes.com, Feb. 17):

In 1984, the Democratic Party ceded the playing field to the Republican far right when it shut out Jesse Jackson's message of economic and social justice and peace with our neighbors in favor of its neoliberal agenda.

As the campaign coordinator for Mr. Jackson's National Rainbow Coalition during his presidential primary run, I saw how his message resonated with white working-class voters when he demonstrated that their interests for a better life were no different from those of their Black and brown neighbors.

When white farmers were losing their land to agribusiness, he delivered food from their farms to poor people in the inner cities of the country, cementing a relationship between rural and urban America. When he showed that our tax dollars were going to build weapons instead of feeding and housing people, those who had never voted or been involved in politics before began volunteering their time.

The political elites feared this kind of message and thus sought to portray him at first as a charlatan, then as a spoiler, and finally as a candidate who spoke only for African Americans.

Walter Mondale, the candidate of the Democratic Party elites, lost the 1984 race to Ronald Reagan. We have been living with the consequences of this major failure of imagination ever since.

Sheila D. Collins
New Rochelle, N.Y.
The writer is the author of "The Rainbow Challenge: The Jackson Campaign and the Future of U.S. Politics."

--
June Zaccone
National Jobs for All Network
http://www.njfac.org

--
This list is only for announcements, so you may not post. To contact the list manager, write to junez [at] njfac.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "goodjobs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to goodjobsforall+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/goodjobsforall/CAPV%3DhmD4XpO5NKEyN_HfbDSjYm%2B%2BwChNOwK70-ckaqxK8Zne0Q%40mail.gmail.com.

Monday, February 9, 2026

[NJFAC] China's realistic poverty determination vs. that of US


....Over the past few decades, the Chinese government has lifted more than 800 million people out of extreme poverty, an achievement that international institutions have described as the greatest poverty alleviation achievement in human history.

Today, the Chinese people enjoy near-universal health insurance, with doctor visits often costing no more than a New York subway ride. Major medical expenses are covered through a simple national insurance system, shielding families from financial ruin due to illness. China also has one of the highest homeownership rates in the world, with more than 90% of households owning their homes.

Healthy life expectancy in China now exceeds that of the United States by four years (68.6 compared to 64.4). The country's incarceration rate is 80% lower than that of the U.S. and 32% below the global average. Meanwhile, public satisfaction with the Chinese government consistently exceeds 90%, far higher than in the United States. These statistics reveal the results of deliberate policies and a social system designed to prioritize people's well-being.

So how has China done it?

To start, in China, "extreme poverty" is defined not simply by income. Instead, it's defined by whether people can live with basic dignity and security. According to standards outlined by the State Council, a household can only be removed from the poverty register if its income stably exceeded the national poverty line and its members had guaranteed access to food, clothing, education, and healthcare. Poverty status is verified through a multilayered public process involving village committees, local residents, and Communist Party working groups, with results posted publicly for review. Entire villages and counties are evaluated based on poverty rates, infrastructure, public services, and economic development, and are subject to inspections and audits at multiple government levels. The system is remarkable in its transparency and emphasis on real living conditions, making poverty alleviation concrete and measurable.

In contrast, the United States defines poverty almost entirely through income thresholds that bear little relationship to real living conditions. The federal poverty line does not account for regional housing costs, medical debt, childcare, or student loans, and it offers no guarantee of access to healthcare, stable housing, or education. As a result, millions of Americans are officially considered "above poverty" while still unable to afford rent, medical treatment, or basic necessities. Unlike China's multilayered system of public verification and government accountability, poverty in the U.S. is treated largely as an individual failure rather than a structural problem. So if you fall into homelessness, the blame is on you, not the system that put you there."....

--
June Zaccone
National Jobs for All Network
http://www.njfac.org

--
This list is only for announcements, so you may not post. To contact the list manager, write to junez [at] njfac.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "goodjobs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to goodjobsforall+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/goodjobsforall/CAPV%3DhmAoPfruCaEv-DH%3DpEFhGnDx9Cn4U%3DU_8app5qXch%3DSFZA%40mail.gmail.com.

Wednesday, January 14, 2026

[NJFAC] EPI webinar Jan. 22 What's missing from the affordability debate?

The EPI Logo


What's missing from the affordability debate? Everyone is talking about affordability — and making the same mistake. Come join Economic Policy Institute President, Heidi Shierholz, and Chief Economist, Josh Bivens, for a conversation about what's missing from the current debate!Who: EPI President Heidi Shierholz & Chief Economist Josh Bivens 

  • What: Virtual discussion about what's missing from the affordability debate

  • When: 3:00 – 4:00 P.M. EST on Thursday, January 22, 2026

Economic Policy Institute President, Heidi Shierholz


EPI President,
Heidi Shierholz

Economic Policy Institute Chief Economist, Josh Bivens



EPI Chief Economist,
Josh Bivens

Register for the webinar here
 

 

Follow Us Online

Bluesky icon
Facebook icon
LinkedIn icon
Spotify icon
Email iconForward this email to a friend
 

The EPI Logo

Our mailing address is:
Economic Policy Institute 1225 Eye St. NW Suite 600 Washington, DC 20005 USA 

--
June Zaccone
National Jobs for All Network
http://www.njfac.org

--
This list is only for announcements, so you may not post. To contact the list manager, write to junez [at] njfac.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "goodjobs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to goodjobsforall+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/goodjobsforall/CAPV%3DhmBOJ7_uDru0eJPH8m3_9dsiGOq%3Dmam8f_UAZ%3DrDyWzEOA%40mail.gmail.com.

Friday, January 9, 2026

[NJFAC] BLS: labor share of income for Q3 2025 is the lowest on record.

--
This list is only for announcements, so you may not post. To contact the list manager, write to junez [at] njfac.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "goodjobs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to goodjobsforall+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/goodjobsforall/CAPV%3DhmDmqcOpULX4Nfb8BLVPtGiZ7KmqR7CMuJ%2BOEhhL7vxfxw%40mail.gmail.com.

Tuesday, January 6, 2026

[NJFAC] some disturbing labor force disability stats

AJ Leonardi, MBBS, PhD @fitterhappierAJ https://x.com/fitterhappierAJ/status/2006459031687410037
This is on the people that overhyped immunity to covid In 2021 I was asked by a high up market person what the future of long covid and disability in the US was. 

I told them it would continue to get worse and reinfections would accumulate harm and disability 

In 2022 a journalist for an MIT publication interviewed me. I said covid would cause disability and wear at immunity via T cell death at a population level to cause other diseases to increase. I did not pull punches in that video recorded interview with them. That was now published last month in eLife. In 2022/2023 an MIT working group was scheduling me to ask about the future of Long Covid and what it would do. 

They never followed up, but now you have it clearly, in late 2025/2026 There is no treatment for Long Covid It is a valid and real disability and the greatest irony is that the people who qualify as "normal" and the "average" will be touched by T cell loss as published recently

Quote@dwallacewells 

Image
--
June Zaccone
National Jobs for All Network
http://www.njfac.org

--
This list is only for announcements, so you may not post. To contact the list manager, write to junez [at] njfac.org
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "goodjobs" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to goodjobsforall+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/goodjobsforall/CAPV%3DhmCeaKYiGwFp0wzSJZqe3CSQXwT9PJKqXo-_5Hjeiy3DJw%40mail.gmail.com.